9 common sense and questions about private bodyguards (original boutique)

When entrepreneurs, stars, celebrities and other groups need personal protection, they will need the existence of bodyguards. Bodyguards provide security barriers for customers. In fact, there are many jobs outside the protection work. Moreover, people are unfamiliar with this professional field or may have misunderstandings. To this end, WangPaiDun bodyguard company lists some common sense and problems for you in order to understand the industry. Do bodyguards have to be burly? In some media images, people who come in handy are useful when security personnel control or try to surround a group of screaming people. However, not all "close protection personnel" need to be as big as professional wrestlers. The founder of ACE Shield security consulting (Beijing) Co., Ltd. said: "it's a bit like buying a car. Sometimes they want a large domineering SUV, and sometimes they want a practical and low-key car. Therefore, the standard selection depends not only on the customer, but also on the nature of the task." the gun (fist) is very beautiful. In foreign countries, according to the level of protection tasks, Bodyguards may or may not be armed. According to Kent Moyer, President and CEO of the world conservation organization and former bodyguard of Playboy founder Hugh Hefner, security experts who deliberately pursue force (firearms) solutions have almost failed. As a professional bodyguard, the focus should be on prevention, avoidance, solution and removal. If force (gun) is needed to respond to force (gun), the system thinking can prove unqualified and backward. The responsibility of excessive use of security personnel is obvious, a phenomenon often seen in the security industry over the years, That is, bodyguards may be used by others in addition to serving employers. For example, the bodyguard of the chairman of the company is arranged by other executives such as the general manager, and the employer's family instructs other jobs. This behavior is not a wise move. At the same time, it also proves that the bodyguard has no professional quality and basic principles. Excessive use will only distract the center of gravity, unable to concentrate, increase the difficulty of affairs, etc. this phenomenon is extremely infeasible in high-intensity strict protection work. Celebrity needs for accepting the protection task of celebrity customers, when you show a good image, you are captured by the news media and gossip websites, which is a good option to prove the popularity for customers. We often see news reports: "who's bodyguard and so on, and perfectly show the successful arrest and release on the Internet." such news is good news for celebrity customers. In this task, we need to consider more image, site, on-site control safety and real-time dynamic operation response. What you see may be performances. We often see the phenomenon that some stars / celebrities are surrounded by a group of people in suits and sunglasses during press conferences or activities on TV. These protectors seem to be very serious, but as experts in the professional field, we can see the unprofessional phenomenon at a glance. In China, many are at the customer level, just to create public opinion topics and the importance of public awareness, and only pay attention to whether the personnel are high, strong or not, and the price is low. Professionalism is of little use to them. Ace shield bodyguard company sometimes receives some such commercial activities to create spectacular and powerful public importance and "crowd performance" for customers. Obviously, the activity is not a real threat. It is about performance, so we will refuse the activity because we only provide real protection. " Bodyguards will save more time for customers. In addition to safety, bodyguards will also shoulder more responsibilities. Therefore, employers will greatly improve efficiency and quality in the arrangement of daily activities and work communication. Because before that, the bodyguards have made more preparations and plans for this. For security personnel with improper professional ethics, we often see that so and so bodyguards have protected who. The intention is obviously to share the reputation of customers to achieve their own value recognition. This phenomenon is firmly not allowed to exist in the internal personnel of WangPaiDun bodyguard company. As a security practitioner, at the level of treating customers, the most basic thing is confidentiality and respect, not to show off and value recognition. This behavior is shameful. However, I see that many people regard "it" as a kind of publicity and show off capital, think it is keeping pace with the times, and think it is what customers want to see at the customer level, such as who, who, who, who, who, who, who, who, if the customer has a great reputation, as some customers, they will intangibly affirm their ability and bring a sense of vanity. I would like to say that this is an abnormal phenomenon. It should not become a capital to boast. It should be based on basic professional ethics when it is separated from specialty. Imagine what you would think if you were a "former customer"? The answer is self-evident! We will never expose any data and information of our customers, which is respect and professional ethics. The real profession is not who you have served. But whether you can serve now. There are differences among individual customers, such as personality, field, risk, requirements, focus and so on. Use social media carefully. With the change of the Internet, it brings convenience and synchronization. Especially for well-known celebrities, they maintain popularity and activity through interaction with social media, which usually means publishing information about their travel and activities. For fan users, this behavior provides an interesting perspective for their. However, the Internet is a double-edged sword. For potential threats, it is simply a real-time broadcast and road map. There are not so many real bodyguards. To tell the truth, few bodyguards will claim to be bodyguards to the outside world. This is obviously a brainless move, bringing unnecessary attention and unknown risks. We often think that wearing a suit and looking at everything around us is a bodyguard, which is obviously a wrong concept. In fact, the of a real bodyguard may not be visible or obvious in reality, because the integration of the environment is the basic quality of professionalism. Moreover, many people who have not really received professional security system training are also full of the market, and they always think they can do a good job in protective work. It is often mentioned that I retired from XX special force, I graduated from XX military school, etc. I want to say that these are two concepts. For example, veterans of a certain special force have good moral quality, excellent physical quality and professional skills, but the system focuses on elimination and attack. Another example is that so and so athletes also focus on victory and defeat, while the professional system of bodyguards focuses on defense and elimination. Obviously, the conceptual system is very different and contrary.