The founder of Midea Group was hijacked! Worth pondering

Event review on the evening of June 14, he Hengjian, founder and actual controller of Midea Group, was reportedly hijacked at home at about 17:30 p.m. on the 14th. At about 7:10 a.m. on June 15, Foshan Public Security Bureau issued a police report, saying that at about 17:30 on June 14, Foshan 110 received an alarm: an outsider broke into a house in Junlan living village of Midea Group, Beijiao Town, Shunde District, threatening the personal safety of personnel in the house. After receiving the report, the provincial, municipal and district public security organs attached great importance to it and quickly organized the police force to rush to the scene for disposal. At 5 a.m. on June 15th, the police suspect 5 suspects were arrested. During the disposal process, no one was injured and the victim he was safe. At present, the case is under further investigation. The above is the whole process of the case. "The founder of Midea was kidnapped and threatened", which made headlines in major media overnight and became the focus of national public opinion. This incident has once again awakened people's memories of the kidnapping of the rich in those years. 1. In 1983, Wang Dehui, founder of Hong Kong Chinachem group, was kidnapped twice and thrown into the high seas for the second time. 2. In 1996 and 1997, the kidnapping of Li zeju, the eldest son of Li Ka Shing, the richest man in Hong Kong, and Guo Bingxiang, the second richest man in Hong Kong. 3. In 1998 and 99, Yu Minhong was robbed. 4. In 1999, Wu Shiji, vice president of Fujian Heng'an group, and his family were killed in the home of room 1, room 4, fifth floor. 5. In 2000, the residence of Xue Yongxin, President of Enwei Group, and the car of his eldest son were bombed. 6. On January 22, 2003, Li Haicang, chairman of Haixin Group, was shot and killed in the company's office due to personal contradictions. 7. On November 16, 2009, Chengdu billionaire Liu Qingxin was stabbed three times by a murderer in his office building. 8. In September 2013, Zong Qinghou, founder of Wahaha, was suspected of being near his home for revenge and was cut off the muscles of four fingers of his left hand. 9. In 2013, Zhang Quan, chairman of Yuehai global logistics, was kidnapped in an underground garage in Shenzhen, and the kidnappers demanded a ransom of 160 million yuan. The security awareness of China's rich is still very weak. In recent years, cases of kidnapping, blackmail threats, violence, privacy disclosure and so on have rarely occurred. The rich and dignitaries in many overseas countries will spend some expenses on the expenditure of the security team every year. It can be imagined that there are still some criticisms and backward ideas in the concept of security, both in the security institutions and in the customers' understanding and acceptance of the concept of security, With the reform and opening up, the rapid development of domestic economy and the lag of security technology and recognition thinking, such as hiring only when there is danger, lack of safety awareness, etc. However, 99% of the real security work is carried out before the danger comes. Bodyguards are not thugs, nor receptionists, nor the stage for "one person" heroism, Strictly speaking, a rigorous and standardized security work needs to be carried out by the whole professional team. This is a comprehensive design combining multiple entities. It operates on the establishment of safety and top-level factors. How about the security costs of foreign rich people? Zuckerberg's personal security expenses reached US $23.4 million per year, about RMB 165 million, an increase of US $3.4 million compared with 2018. Cheryl Sandberg, Facebook's chief operating officer, spent US $4.37 million on personal security in 2019, higher than US $2.9 million in 2018. Amazon's annual security spending on Bezos is $1.6 million a year, which has not changed since 2012. Oracle added $1.5 million to strengthen CEO Larry Ellison's residential security. Compared with them, apple spent $209000 last year to protect the security of its executive Tim Cook. After the kidnapping of Mr. Li Ka Shing's eldest son, the annual security expenditure of the Li Ka Shing family is 1 billion yuan. The rich are usually one of the most economical groups. Businessmen pursue the maximization of interests and the minimization of losses. They say "is it cost-effective" in everything. It can be seen that the rich have spent high prices on security, obviously with their cost-effective consideration. In fact, good things have never been cheap. Cheap things are not necessarily good, because professional and high-quality things need to be produced at a high cost. The occurrence of this incident undoubtedly boosted the just needed development and attention of the domestic bodyguard market to some extent, but personally, it should be short-lived. In recent years, every event like this will cause an instant wave of attention. Firstly, regardless of the professionalism of the selected organization, the output of the high-end security industry is also extremely limited in China. Moreover, when the attention to the event gradually fades out of everyone's vision, it will become ignored until the next event rebound effect. This is a bad phenomenon. In the final analysis, it is related to market cognition and industry recognition. In the current domestic environment, the multidimensional risk factors of complexity, variability, daily dynamic recessiveness and event destruction are increasing, and the strength, difficulty and sustainability required by security work are becoming higher and higher. As a customer, we should first improve the awareness and attention of the security concept, and we also need to carefully consider the choice. If we want to obtain professional and all-round protection, we need not only investment, but also find a professional team to do professional things.